Episodes

  • Special: Top 5 Articles of 2024

    Special: Top 5 Articles of 2024
    Dec 24 2024
    This is a special episode of The Non-Prophets: the Top 5 Articles of 2024. Enjoy!

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 32 mins
  • 20yr Sentence in Mass SA Case

    20yr Sentence in Mass SA Case
    Dec 22 2024
    French prosecutors demand 20-year sentence for ex-husband in Pelicot mass rape case

    France24, By NEWS WIRES, on 25/11/2024

    https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20241125-court-moves-to-sentencing-in-french-mass-rape-trial

    The case of Dominique Piqueux, currently on trial in France, has horrified the public with its sheer magnitude and depravity. Over a decade, Piqueux allegedly sedated his wife, Gisèle, enabling other men—whom he recruited online—to rape her while he documented the abuse through photos and videos. A total of 72 men reportedly responded to his invitations, with 50 facing trial alongside him. Gisèle bravely refused a closed trial, earning applause and support for shedding light on the widespread, systematic abuse. This trial has sparked a critical dialogue in France, particularly about the diverse profiles of the accused and whether they reflect broader societal tendencies. While some attribute abusive behavior to childhood trauma and psychological predispositions, others caution against using such explanations as justifications.

    The defense strategies employed—ranging from denial to claims of consent through the husband—highlight the disturbing complexity and persistent misconceptions about consent and rape. The case has also underscored the importance of societal education on these issues. In particular, it reveals how cultural understandings of consent, such as the need for explicit and enthusiastic agreement, may differ internationally.

    In France, as in other parts of the world, this trial may serve as a critical turning point in how rape and systemic abuse are understood, addressed, and prosecuted. Advocates hope it will inspire better rape laws and a more profound societal reckoning with these crimes.

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.50.4 featuring Infidel 64, Cindy Plaza, AJ and Rob

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show More Show Less
    19 mins
  • Church Uses Nativity Scene to Mock Atheists

    Church Uses Nativity Scene to Mock Atheists
    Dec 21 2024
    Nativity scene controversy: Local atheist says church's new display takes it too Far

    KGAN, By Nick El Hajj, on November 28, 2024

    https://cbs2iowa.com/news/local/nativity-scene-controversy-local-atheist-says-churchs-new-display-takes-it-too-far

    Solid Rock Bible Church in Iowa added an unusual twist to its nativity scene this year, including King Herod as a character and labeling him an atheist. This provocative choice ties non-belief to the infamous biblical ruler who allegedly ordered the massacre of infants in an attempt to kill baby Jesus. The story of Herod’s massacre, however, appears in only one gospel—Matthew—and lacks historical evidence. The church’s exaggerated depiction of Herod, complete with fangs, raises questions about its motives and the broader implications of demonizing atheists.

    Cindy reflects on the entrenched American stereotype that atheists lack morality, a misconception rooted in religious beliefs. She contrasts this with Europe, where atheists do not face such widespread prejudice. Cindy also notes that while the nativity scene’s exaggerations are offensive, they are ultimately harmless due to their placement on private property. She humorously suggests that the church should fully embrace its theatrical tendencies by adding characters like Bugs Bunny to the scene.

    AJ highlights the irony of the display, pointing out that the Bible itself recounts God ordering the killing of babies in Egypt. He critiques the lack of historical corroboration for Herod’s alleged massacre, arguing that the display relies solely on the Bible's narrative. AJ also emphasizes the issue of religious displays in public spaces, firmly opposing taxpayer-funded religious symbolism. He defends efforts to remove unconstitutional displays, arguing that such actions protect the principle of freedom of religion for all citizens.

    Rob finds the theatrical nativity scene amusing but critiques its demonization of atheists. He contrasts this with the Satanic Temple's Baphomet statues, which aim to normalize rather than vilify. Rob notes that while the church's exaggerations are laughable, they reveal a deeper intent to perpetuate harmful stereotypes about atheists. He dismisses concerns about a resurgence of satanic panic, suggesting that the rise of non-religious Americans makes such widespread moral panics unlikely.

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.50.3 featuring Infidel 64, Cindy Plaza, AJ and Rob

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show More Show Less
    20 mins
  • Equality Rollback: Ban Gay Marriage Again?

    Equality Rollback: Ban Gay Marriage Again?
    Dec 19 2024
    This Michigan lawmaker wants to 'Make Gay Marriage Illegal Again'

    Raw Story, By David Badash, The New Civil Rights Movement, on December 3, 2024

    https://www.rawstory.com/this-michigan-lawmaker-wants-to-make-gay-marriage-illegal-again/

    Josh Schriver, a Michigan state representative, is advocating for a regressive agenda by attempting to outlaw same-sex marriage in the state. Claiming to be Michigan's "most conservative" representative, his efforts reflect a performative stance rather than a genuine political strategy, as even his own staff resigned en masse following his controversial proposals. Public backlash aligns with national statistics showing 69% of Americans opposing such a ban, highlighting Schriver's miscalculation of societal and political support. His rhetoric extends beyond marriage equality, targeting transgender rights, reproductive health, and gender-affirming care, all under the guise of personal moral convictions often rooted in conservative religious beliefs.

    The discussion highlighted how personal beliefs, particularly religious ones, can dangerously influence political decisions.

    Cindy argued that such stances stem from a combination of entitlement and a superiority complex, as politicians like Schriver actively seek to revoke rights already established for over a decade. She also emphasized the broader consequences of normalized bigotry, drawing parallels to the aftermath of Trump’s election in 2016, which emboldened similar hate-filled rhetoric.

    AJ expanded on this, stressing that religious dogma must remain separate from public service, as imposing these beliefs erodes individual freedoms.

    Yet, Rob countered that while such compartmentalization is ideal, it’s often unrealistic given how deeply religious convictions shape moral worldviews. He proposed that societal education and early prevention are critical to avoiding these regressive ideologies in governance. The panel concluded by discussing the alarming potential for these backward policies to erode societal norms and legal rights. Schriver’s actions represent a broader, dangerous trend of using fear and hatred against marginalized groups as a political tool, exacerbating divisions and rolling back decades of progress.

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.50.2 featuring Infidel 64, Cindy Plaza, AJ and Rob

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show More Show Less
    22 mins
  • Buc-ee’s: Capitalism Runs on Beaver Nuggets

    Buc-ee’s: Capitalism Runs on Beaver Nuggets
    Dec 17 2024
    Buc-ee's Is The Sickness At The Heart Of America

    Jalopnik, By Bradley Brownell, on November 28, 2024

    https://jalopnik.com/buc-ees-is-the-sickness-at-the-heart-of-america-1851683139

    This lively panel discussion dives into the phenomenon of Buc-ee's, the larger-than-life Texas-based gas station and convenience store chain that has captured the American imagination. The conversation unpacks Buc-ee's appeal, its critique of consumer excess, and its broader cultural implications. AJ kicks things off by describing Buc-ee's as a satirical reflection of overconsumption in America, with its over-the-top offerings ranging from sugary snacks to obscure gadgets, pointing out its immense profitability and attraction despite its indulgent nature.

    Rob draws a compelling parallel between Buc-ee's and religious cathedrals, positing that the chain symbolizes modern American values of convenience and consumption, becoming a quasi-monument to consumer culture. Cindy, offering an outsider's European perspective, contrasts the car-centric uniformity of American cities with Europe's history-rich, pedestrian-friendly urban planning. She sees Buc-ee's as emblematic of a uniquely American approach to architecture and lifestyle.

    The panelists ultimately agree that Buc-ee's represents an intersection of cultural identity, consumerism, and convenience, raising questions about how such spaces reflect societal values and the future of urban landscapes.

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.50.1 featuring Infidel 64, Cindy Plaza, AJ and Rob

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show More Show Less
    19 mins
  • Unhinged Reactions or Real Fear?

    Unhinged Reactions or Real Fear?
    Dec 15 2024
    Unhinged election outcry reveals failed promise of secular salvation


    Fox News, By Jim Daly, on November 17, 2024

    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/unhinged-election-outcry-reveals-failed-promise-secular-salvation

    This discussion critiques Jim Daly's opinion piece in Fox News, where he accuses the political left of hysteria following electoral losses. The panel rebuts this, highlighting the right's own emotionally charged reactions, from election denial to performative outrage (e.g., destroying products like Bud Light and Nike). The group explores broader issues such as perceived threats to democracy and rule of law, particularly the dangers of right-wing policies rooted in Christian nationalism.

    The conversation pivots to the persistent scapegoating of LGBTQ+ communities, focusing on the alleged "trans agenda." The panel dismantles this narrative, emphasizing the importance of respecting lived experiences and scientific understanding of gender as a spectrum. The right's obsession with controlling gender and sexuality is likened to historic moral panics, such as the 1980s "Satanic Panic," which targeted cultural phenomena like rock music. However, the panel warns, this modern panic targets people, posing direct threats to their safety and rights.

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.49.4 featuring Jimmy Jr., Kelley Laughlin, Aaron Jensen and Eli Slack

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show More Show Less
    24 mins
  • Understanding Belief Formation

    Understanding Belief Formation
    Dec 14 2024
    What delusions can tell us about the cognitive nature of belief

    The Conversation, By Michael Connors and Peter W Halligan, on November 19, 2024

    http://theconversation.com/what-delusions-can-tell-us-about-the-cognitive-nature-of-belief-243627


    This episode of The Non-Prophets explores the intricate relationship between belief, delusion, and religious convictions. Hosted by Eli Slack, the discussion is prompted by an article from The Conversation by Michael Connors and Peter Hallagan, examining whether beliefs and delusions share common psychological roots. The article highlights that the primary difference between the two lies not in the mental process of formation but in the number of adherents, challenging our perceptions of "normal" beliefs versus delusional thinking.

    The panel delves into a case study of a woman experiencing postpartum psychosis, whose delusions were shaped by interpreting ordinary stimuli in the context of her personal biases. This underscores a universal mechanism: beliefs, whether true or false, arise from subjective interpretations of sensory input filtered through emotional and cognitive biases. Eli emphasizes that religious beliefs, while not inherently indicative of mental instability, share no epistemological advantage over delusions.

    The group critiques the article's lack of a clear definition of belief, a flaw that hampers meaningful discourse. Kelley asserts that beliefs are often embraced without critical thought, making them stagnant compared to an active pursuit of understanding. The panel also discusses societal double standards—other religions are dismissed as myths, while Christianity often escapes such scrutiny due to its dominant cultural presence.

    Aaron and Kelley explore how psychology struggles to distinguish beliefs from delusions, suggesting that the objective truth—or lack thereof—defines the difference. Aaron provocatively argues that religion meets the criteria for delusion, as it lacks verifiable evidence, yet garners social acceptance when widely shared. Kelley supports this by highlighting how belief systems solidify when critical thought ceases.

    The conversation concludes with reflections on societal norms and the dangers of uncritically accepted beliefs. While respecting individual faiths, the panel underscores the value of skepticism and evidence-based reasoning in navigating the complexities of belief and delusion.

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.49.3 featuring Jimmy Jr., Kelley Laughlin, Aaron Jensen and Eli Slack

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show More Show Less
    19 mins
  • Biblical Myths Shape Immigration Propaganda

    Biblical Myths Shape Immigration Propaganda
    Dec 12 2024
    Americans use the Book of Revelation to talk about immigration – and always have

    RNS, By Yii-Jan Lin, on October 24, 2024

    https://religionnews.com/2024/10/24/americans-use-the-book-of-revelation-to-talk-about-immigration-and-always-have/

    The discussion focuses on the historical and ongoing use of the Bible, particularly The Book of Revelation, to demonize marginalized groups, including immigrants. This practice leverages religious imagery and rhetoric to manipulate public perception, often painting outsiders as threats to societal order. The article under review highlights how Revelation, originally a cryptic critique of Roman oppression written by a persecuted group, has been weaponized over centuries to justify bigotry and fearmongering. Despite its messages of ultimate triumph for believers, its "us versus them" narrative has provided a convenient tool for exclusion and vilification.

    The panel examines the broader implications of using Revelation and similar texts to influence policy and societal attitudes. Politicians often exploit these texts for psychological manipulation, instilling fear to galvanize support for restrictive policies. By framing issues like immigration as moral or religious battles, leaders manipulate voters, invoking apocalyptic imagery to make dissent feel complicit in divine punishment. This strategy simplifies complex socio-political issues into binary moral conflicts, eroding nuanced understanding and fostering division.

    The conversation also addresses the broader patterns of tribalism and fear inherent in human psychology. Tribalism, coupled with humanity’s propensity for pattern recognition, fuels the tendency to “other” certain groups. This innate trait, present throughout history, is exacerbated during times of uncertainty, making societies more susceptible to scapegoating. The Bible, while not the origin of such tendencies, amplifies them by offering frameworks that justify exclusion and superiority under the guise of divine authority.

    The discussion critiques how this pattern persists disproportionately in the U.S. compared to other developed nations. Militant Christianity, prevalent in America and certain parts of the Global South, often contradicts the supposed central message of love and understanding found in the teachings of Jesus. The irony is underscored by historical examples, such as anti-Irish sentiment in the 19th century, to demonstrate how bigotry morphs but remains rooted in similar fears and justifications.

    Ultimately, the panel highlights the dangers of allowing such rhetoric to shape public discourse and policy. Education about the historical and cultural contexts of biblical texts is presented as a vital tool for countering misuse and encouraging critical thinking. While tribalism may be inherent, challenging its manifestations through awareness and inclusivity offers a way to combat the divisive narratives that continue to exploit religious texts for power and control.

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.49.2 featuring Jimmy Jr., Kelley Laughlin, Aaron Jensen and Eli Slack

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show More Show Less
    24 mins