
The Afghanistan Papers
A Secret History of the War
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Buy Now for £12.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Dan Bittner
About this listen
A Washington Post Best Book of 2021
The number-one New York Times best-selling investigative story of how three successive presidents and their military commanders deceived the public year after year about America’s longest war, foreshadowing the Taliban’s recapture of Afghanistan, by Washington Post reporter and three-time Pulitzer Prize finalist Craig Whitlock.
Unlike the wars in Vietnam and Iraq, the US invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 had near-unanimous public support. At first, the goals were straightforward and clear: Defeat al-Qaeda and prevent a repeat of 9/11. Yet soon after the United States and its allies removed the Taliban from power, the mission veered off-course and US officials lost sight of their original objectives.
Distracted by the war in Iraq, the US military become mired in an unwinnable guerrilla conflict in a country it did not understand. But no president wanted to admit failure, especially in a war that began as a just cause. Instead, the Bush, Obama, and Trump administrations sent more and more troops to Afghanistan and repeatedly said they were making progress, even though they knew there was no realistic prospect for an outright victory.
Just as the Pentagon Papers changed the public’s understanding of Vietnam, The Afghanistan Papers contains “fast-paced and vivid” (The New York Times Book Review) revelation after revelation from people who played a direct role in the war, from leaders in the White House and the Pentagon to soldiers and aid workers on the front lines. In unvarnished language, they admit that the US government’s strategies were a mess, that the nation-building project was a colossal failure, and that drugs and corruption gained a stranglehold over their allies in the Afghan government. All told, the account is based on interviews with more than 1,000 people who knew that the US government was presenting a distorted, and sometimes entirely fabricated, version of the facts on the ground.
Documents unearthed by The Washington Post reveal that President Bush didn’t know the name of his Afghanistan war commander - and didn’t want to meet with him. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld admitted that he had “no visibility into who the bad guys are”. His successor, Robert Gates, said: “We didn’t know jack shit about al-Qaeda.”
The Afghanistan Papers is a “searing indictment of the deceit, blunders, and hubris of senior military and civilian officials” (Tom Bowman, NRP Pentagon Correspondent) that will supercharge a long-overdue reckoning over what went wrong and forever change the way the conflict is remembered.
©2021 Craig Whitlock and The Washington Post (P)2021 Simon & Schuster AudioCritic reviews
"Craig Whitlock has forged a searing indictment of the deceit, blunders, and hubris of senior military and civilian officials, with the same tragic echoes of the Vietnam conflict. The American dead, wounded, and their families deserved wiser and more honorable leaders.” (Tom Bowman, NPR Pentagon correspondent)
“At once page-turning and rigorous, The Afghanistan Papers makes a lasting and revelatory contribution to the record of America's tragic management of our longest war. In transparent and nuanced detail, Whitlock chronicles how American leaders and commanders undermined their country's promises to the Afghans who counted on them and to the US troops who made the ultimate sacrifice after 9/11.” (Steve Coll, Pulitzer Prize-winning author of Ghost Wars and Directorate S)
“The Afghanistan Papers is a gripping account of why the war in Afghanistan lasted so long. The missed opportunities, the outright mistakes, and more than anything, the firsthand accounts from senior commanders who only years later acknowledged they simply did not tell the American people what they knew about how the war was going.” (Barbara Starr, CNN Pentagon correspondent)
Craig Whitlock uses a really compelling mix of almost anecdotal reflection based on sources of evidence and statistics that reinforce and elaborate upon the points being made. Easy to understand and doesn't fall into the trap of simply repeating facts and figures ... looking forward to reading the book when it arrives!
Breathtaking ...
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
The madness of American misadventures where they have no business being involved
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
phenomenal
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
insightful read highly recommended
Astonishing
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Excellent book
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
One, it outlines the extent to which they were willing to lie to the American public, lies in which the other NATO governments colluded. The really barmy thing is (missed by this book because of its US-centric approach) that plenty of policy analysts, observers and citizens in the NATO countries were openly saying that the war was unwinnable from day one. If this book proves anything, it’s that they were right. You can hypothesise a world in which the US military under Bush concentrated on the capture of Bin Laden rather than nation building, you can imagine an invasion force which took seriously the differences between US/Western and the multiple Afghan cultures, and you can pretend that being smarter in respect of Pakistan’s double dealing might have avoided the major problems that confronted the war. But this is to misunderstand how wars are fought and what exactly Bush and his PNAC coterie wanted: billions in private sector contracts for their campaign contributors and a reliable geostrategic counterweight in Central Asia. Both Obama and Trump, regardless of their campaigns, joined in the US military establishment’s groupthink, wasting blood and treasure on nothing.
Two, even if you believe that nation building etc are valid goals, the book is devastating towards how utterly incompetent the US in particular but also the NATO-led ISAF forces were at doing any of this. Stupidity, self-interest, cowardice and plenty of other epithets can be applied to many of the characters whose actions are depicted in this book. Yet these are intelligent people - experienced soldiers, graduates of elite universities, some of righteous purpose with more sensitivity to their mission, personally courageous. In their unguarded moments, they identify for themselves many of the key failures. Yet despite their rank, access to or their own place in the political establishment and the resources at their disposal, none of them could do anything. That’s the extent of the madness of the Western political systems, which ultimately governed the “intervention” (invasion and occupation) of Afghanistan.
Devastating critique of Afghanistan war
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
not enough meat on the bone...
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
If you are a casual historian, this is a good listen for you - very interesting as it is such a recent event.
Pretty interesting listen
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
But it’s kinda soft, bit wishaywashy
& he dates “oral history interview “ about a 1000 times. Gets irritating
But otherwise ok 👍
It’s fine
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.