
Imitation Democracy
The Development of Russia's Post-Soviet Political System
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
3 months free
Buy Now for £12.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Rich Miller
-
By:
-
Dmitrii Furman
About this listen
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia under Yeltsin and Putin implemented a political system of "imitation democracy," marked by "a huge disparity between formal constitutional principles and the reality of authoritarian rule." How did this system take shape, how else might it have developed, and what are the prospects for re-envisioning it more democratically in the future?
These questions animate Dmitrii Furman's Imitation Democracy, a welcome antidote to books that blandly decry Putin as an omnipotent dictator, without considering his platforms, constituencies, and sources of power. With extensive public opinion polling drawn from throughout the late- and post-Soviet period, Furman offers a definitive account of the formation of the modern Russian political system, casting it into powerful relief through comparisons with other post-Soviet states.
Peopled with grey technocrats, warring oligarchs, patriots, and provocateurs, Furman's narrative details the struggles among partisan factions, and the waves of public sentiment, that shaped modern Russia's political landscape, culminating in Putin's third presidential term, which resolves the contradiction between the "form" and "content" of imitation democracy, "the formal dependence of power on elections and the actual dependence of elections on power."
©2022 Translation copyright 2022 by Ian Dreiblatt; Foreword copyright 2022 by Keith Gessen; Afterword copyright 2022 by Tony Wood (P)2023 TantorSome criticisms may include that the author seems to believe in some sort of Whig history, that societies inevitably develop towards "democracy". Also that there is no critical evaluation of the concept, or the question of whether Western countries advocating for it are actually ruled by the people. It may also be a little out of date, as it was written in 2009 (but it holds up well). But these are very minor flaws. The afterword by Tony Wood was also a little strange: it lacked the nuance and objectivity of Furman's work and even referred to the current war in Ukraine as the "criminal" invasion.
Very interesting exploration of Russia in the 90s
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.